All positions ranked with analyst notes and live injury status.
This fantasy football draft cheat sheet ranks every position by tier for PPR scoring, with projections, live injury status, and analyst notes. Players are grouped QB, RB, WR, TE, K, and DST, so you can always take the best available player and see where each tier drops off.
| RK | Player | Team | Proj | Tier | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | |||||
| 1 | BUF | 24.4 | T1 | Elite 24.4 pt QB projection makes him a worthwhile early QB selection for dual-threat upside. | |
| 2 | NE | 22.3 | T1 | Strong 22.3 pt QB projection as a rookie starter provides excellent dual-threat upside at the position. | |
| 3 | DAL | 22.0 | T1 | Solid 22 pt projection maintains Prescott as an elite QB option in Dallas' pass-heavy scheme. | |
| Tier 2 | |||||
| 4 | CIN | 21.4 | T2 | Strong 21.4 pt QB projection makes Cincinnati's star passer a premium play at the position. | |
| 5 | JAX | 21.1 | T2 | Solid 21.1 pt QB projection reflects Jacksonville's offensive system supporting strong QB scoring. | |
| 6 | BAL | 20.0 | T2 | Solid 20 pt QB projection reflects Baltimore's run-heavy scheme potentially limiting passing volume for the MVP-caliber talent. | |
| 7 | ARI | 18.9 | T2 | ||
| 8 | CAR | 18.2 | T2 | ||
| Tier 3 | |||||
| 9 | MIN | 18.0 | T3 | ||
| 10 | WAS | 17.8 | T3 | ||
| 11 | GB | 17.1 | T3 | ||
| 12 | KC | 17.1 | T3 | ||
| 13 | NYJ | 16.8 | T3 | ||
| 14 | LV | 16.5 | T3 | ||
| Tier 4 | |||||
| 15 | TB | 16.5 | T4 | ||
| 16 | SEA | 16.3 | T4 | ||
| 17 | DET | 16.2 | T4 | ||
| 18 | LAR | 15.9 | T4 | ||
| 19 | PIT | 15.8 | T4 | ||
| 20 | CHI | 15.8 | T4 | ||
| 21 | ATL | 15.2 | T4 | ||
| 22 | TEN | 14.2 | T4 | ||
| Tier 5 | |||||
| 23 | DEN | 14.1 | T5 | ||
| 24 | MIA | 13.9 | T5 | ||
| RK | Player | Team | Proj | Tier | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | |||||
| 1 | DET | 23.1 | T1 | Strong projection (23.1 pts) as the lead RB in Detroit's offense provides high floor with touchdown upside. | |
| 2 | ATL | 21.2 | T1 | High projection (21.2 pts) suggests significant workload as Atlanta's lead back, but monitor for actual touches vs. game script. | |
| 3 | KC | 20.9 | T1 | Respectable 20.9 pt projection provides solid value as Kansas City's primary RB option. | |
| Tier 2 | |||||
| 4 | LAR | 19.7 | T2 | 19.7 pt projection as the Rams' lead back provides solid PPR value in a pass-heavy offense. | |
| 5 | DAL | 19.3 | T2 | 19.3 pt projection shows Dallas' RB role has significant scoring potential in a high-powered offense. | |
| 6 | IND | 18.8 | T2 | 18.8 pt projection indicates solid role in Indianapolis' offense, though consistency depends on game flow. | |
| 7 | CIN | 17.7 | T2 | 17.7 pt projection suggests a featured role in Cincinnati's backfield committee. | |
| 8 | CAR | 16.8 | T2 | 16.8 pt projection indicates he holds significant backfield role in Carolina's offense. | |
| Tier 3 | |||||
| 9 | LV | 16.5 | T3 | 16.5 pt projection suggests meaningful role in Las Vegas' backfield. | |
| 10 | BUF | 16.2 | T3 | 16.2 pt projection reflects established backup/committee role in Buffalo's backfield. | |
| 11 | BAL | 15.9 | T3 | 15.9 pt projection at age 31 in Baltimore's system provides veteran workhorse value in a run-heavy approach. | |
| 12 | TB | 15.7 | T3 | 15.7 pt projection suggests backfield role in Tampa Bay's offense. | |
| 13 | GB | 15.5 | T3 | 15.5 pt projection reflects established role in Green Bay's backfield. | |
| 14 | PHI | 15.0 | T3 | 15 pt projection for an elite RB talent signals potential role concerns or timeshare in Philadelphia. | |
| Tier 4 | |||||
| 15 | PIT | 15.0 | T4 | 15 pt projection suggests meaningful backfield involvement in Pittsburgh's offense. | |
| 16 | NYJ | 14.8 | T4 | 14.8 pt projection indicates secondary role in New York's backfield despite talent level. | |
| 17 | JAX | 13.9 | T4 | 13.9 pt projection indicates depth or reserve role in Jacksonville's backfield. | |
| 18 | CHI | 13.0 | T4 | 13 pt projection shows limited role or committee status in Chicago's backfield. | |
| 19 | MIA | 12.9 | T4 | 12.9 pt projection suggests depth or reserve status in Miami's backfield. | |
| 20 | MIN | 10.9 | T4 | ||
| 21 | TEN | 10.7 | T4 | ||
| 22 | NE | 10.7 | T4 | ||
| Tier 5 | |||||
| 23 | WAS | 10.5 | T5 | ||
| 24 | LAC | 10.1 | T5 | ||
| 25 | DEN | 10.1 | T5 | ||
| 26 | ARI | 9.9 | T5 | ||
| 27 | CLE | 9.6 | T5 | ||
| 28 | MIN | 9.3 | T5 | ||
| 29 | SEA | 9.1 | T5 | ||
| 30 | PIT | 8.9 | T5 | ||
| Tier 6 | |||||
| 31 | DEN | 8.3 | T6 | ||
| 32 | SEA | 8.0 | T6 | ||
| 33 | ARI | 7.9 | T6 | ||
| 34 | NYJ | 7.7 | T6 | ||
| 35 | TEN | 7.6 | T6 | ||
| 36 | NE | 7.4 | T6 | ||
| 37 | LAR | 7.4 | T6 | ||
| 38 | TB | 7.4 | T6 | ||
| 39 | CIN | 6.7 | T6 | ||
| 40 | LAC | 6.6 | T6 | ||
| 41 | SEA | 6.5 | T6 | ||
| 42 | LAC | 6.2 | T6 | ||
| 43 | CHI | 6.1 | T6 | ||
| 44 | JAX | 5.9 | T6 | ||
| 45 | CLE | 5.9 | T6 | ||
| 46 | ARI | 5.9 | T6 | ||
| 47 | BAL | 5.8 | T6 | ||
| 48 | LV | 5.7 | T6 | ||
| 49 | DEN | 5.7 | T6 | ||
| 50 | WAS | 5.6 | T6 | ||
| 51 | BUF | 5.3 | T6 | ||
| 52 | GB | 5.2 | T6 | ||
| 53 | NE | 5.1 | T6 | ||
| 54 | ATL | 4.4 | T6 | ||
| 55 | KC | 4.3 | T6 | ||
| 56 | MIA | 4.2 | T6 | ||
| 57 | DAL | 3.8 | T6 | ||
| 58 | DET | 3.8 | T6 | ||
| 59 | PHI | 3.5 | T6 | ||
| 60 | WAS | 2.9 | T6 | ||
| RK | Player | Team | Proj | Tier | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | |||||
| 1 | SEA | 25.1 | T1 | Elite projection (25.1 pts) as the clear WR1 makes him a premium selection despite injury concerns requiring monitoring. | |
| 2 | LAR | 21.6 | T1 | Solid projection (21.6 pts) locks in significant volume as the Rams' top receiving option in an elite passing attack. | |
| 3 | DAL | 20.8 | T1 | Consistent 20.8 pt projection reflects elite volume as Dallas' WR1, though consistency can fluctuate with defensive attention. | |
| Tier 2 | |||||
| 4 | CIN | 19.9 | T2 | Elite talent with 19.9 pt projection remains a top-tier WR despite slightly lower scoring than some peers. | |
| 5 | MIN | 18.3 | T2 | 18.3 pt projection slightly below elite peers raises questions about Minnesota's pass volume or distribution. | |
| 6 | BAL | 18.0 | T2 | 18 pt projection as Baltimore's pass-catchers shows he's earned meaningful volume in the Ravens' offense. | |
| 7 | DET | 17.2 | T2 | 17.2 pt projection reflects solid WR volume in Detroit's high-volume passing attack. | |
| 8 | ATL | 17.1 | T2 | 17.1 pt projection shows Atlanta's WR room has him positioned for meaningful targets. | |
| Tier 3 | |||||
| 9 | GB | 16.5 | T3 | 16.5 pt projection reflects established WR role in Green Bay's pass attack. | |
| 10 | NYJ | 16.3 | T3 | 16.3 pt projection as New York's primary WR option provides high-volume opportunity in the passing game. | |
| 11 | CAR | 16.1 | T3 | 16.1 pt projection shows Carolina has integrated him into the passing attack significantly. | |
| 12 | CIN | 16.0 | T3 | 16 pt projection indicates solid role in Cincinnati's WR room despite elite talent level. | |
| 13 | ARI | 15.8 | T3 | 15.8 pt projection shows he's earned consistent target share in Arizona's offense. | |
| 14 | JAX | 15.6 | T3 | 15.6 pt projection indicates developing role in Jacksonville's passing game. | |
| Tier 4 | |||||
| 15 | NE | 15.3 | T4 | 15.3 pt projection despite elite talent raises concerns about New England's offensive volume or scheme fit. | |
| 16 | BUF | 14.4 | T4 | 14.4 pt projection for an elite WR1 talent raises red flags about actual volume or usage in Buffalo. | |
| 17 | CAR | 14.3 | T4 | 14.3 pt projection shows Arizona is deploying the rookie receiver with meaningful opportunity. | |
| 18 | DAL | 14.2 | T4 | 14.2 pt projection reflects secondary or competition-driven role in Dallas' pass attack. | |
| 19 | TEN | 13.6 | T4 | 13.6 pt projection shows Tennessee's receiver is seeing targeted opportunities in the passing game. | |
| 20 | GB | 13.3 | T4 | 13.3 pt projection reflects depth or limited opportunity status in Green Bay's WR room. | |
| 21 | KC | 12.7 | T4 | 12.7 pt projection indicates significantly reduced role in Kansas City's offense. | |
| 22 | PHI | 12.5 | T4 | ||
| Tier 5 | |||||
| 23 | TB | 11.9 | T5 | ||
| 24 | CHI | 11.7 | T5 | ||
| 25 | WAS | 11.7 | T5 | ||
| 26 | DEN | 11.3 | T5 | ||
| 27 | PIT | 11.3 | T5 | ||
| 28 | TEN | 11.1 | T5 | ||
| 29 | TB | 10.6 | T5 | ||
| 30 | LAC | 10.3 | T5 | ||
| Tier 6 | |||||
| 31 | CLE | 10.3 | T6 | ||
| 32 | JAX | 10.2 | T6 | ||
| 33 | CHI | 10.1 | T6 | ||
| 34 | DET | 10.1 | T6 | ||
| 35 | PIT | 10.1 | T6 | ||
| 36 | IND | 9.9 | T6 | ||
| 37 | NYJ | 9.8 | T6 | ||
| 38 | ARI | 9.5 | T6 | ||
| 39 | LV | 9.4 | T6 | ||
| 40 | MIA | 9.3 | T6 | ||
| 41 | KC | 9.1 | T6 | ||
| 42 | MIN | 9.1 | T6 | ||
| 43 | CLE | 9.1 | T6 | ||
| 44 | IND | 9.0 | T6 | ||
| 45 | BUF | 8.9 | T6 | ||
| 46 | NE | 8.8 | T6 | ||
| 47 | DAL | 8.7 | T6 | ||
| 48 | BUF | 7.6 | T6 | ||
| 49 | SEA | 7.5 | T6 | ||
| 50 | DEN | 7.4 | T6 | ||
| 51 | WAS | 7.1 | T6 | ||
| 52 | MIA | 6.9 | T6 | ||
| 53 | LAC | 6.7 | T6 | ||
| 54 | CHI | 6.5 | T6 | ||
| 55 | SEA | 6.5 | T6 | ||
| 56 | TEN | 6.2 | T6 | ||
| 57 | MIN | 6.1 | T6 | ||
| 58 | PHI | 6.0 | T6 | ||
| 59 | BAL | 5.8 | T6 | ||
| 60 | ATL | 5.7 | T6 | ||
| RK | Player | Team | Proj | Tier | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | |||||
| 1 | ARI | 19.2 | T1 | 19.2 pt projection is exceptional for the tight end position, making him a potential league-winner at the position. | |
| 2 | LV | 16.9 | T1 | 16.9 pt projection as a rookie TE1 is exceptional and provides tremendous upside at the position. | |
| 3 | KC | 11.5 | T1 | ||
| Tier 2 | |||||
| 4 | MIN | 11.1 | T2 | ||
| 5 | DET | 11.1 | T2 | ||
| 6 | IND | 10.9 | T2 | ||
| 7 | GB | 10.8 | T2 | ||
| 8 | JAX | 10.5 | T2 | ||
| Tier 3 | |||||
| 9 | CLE | 10.4 | T3 | ||
| 10 | PHI | 10.3 | T3 | ||
| 11 | BUF | 10.3 | T3 | ||
| 12 | NE | 9.6 | T3 | ||
| 13 | CHI | 9.5 | T3 | ||
| 14 | DAL | 9.5 | T3 | ||
| Tier 4 | |||||
| 15 | PIT | 9.2 | T4 | ||
| 16 | NYJ | 8.8 | T4 | ||
| 17 | BAL | 8.8 | T4 | ||
| 18 | CIN | 8.7 | T4 | ||
| 19 | ATL | 8.5 | T4 | ||
| 20 | LAR | 8.4 | T4 | ||
| 21 | SEA | 8.4 | T4 | ||
| 22 | TB | 8.2 | T4 | ||
| Tier 5 | |||||
| 23 | CAR | 7.7 | T5 | ||
| 24 | LV | 7.4 | T5 | ||
| RK | Player | Team | Proj | Tier | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | |||||
| 1 | DAL | 9.9 | T1 | ||
| 2 | IND | 9.4 | T1 | ||
| 3 | MIN | 9.3 | T1 | ||
| Tier 2 | |||||
| 4 | CIN | 9.2 | T2 | ||
| 5 | JAX | 9.1 | T2 | ||
| 6 | TB | 8.8 | T2 | ||
| 7 | GB | 8.8 | T2 | ||
| 8 | SEA | 8.6 | T2 | ||
| Tier 3 | |||||
| 9 | LV | 8.5 | T3 | ||
| 10 | WAS | 8.5 | T3 | ||
| 11 | DET | 8.4 | T3 | ||
| 12 | ARI | 8.1 | T3 | ||
| 13 | PIT | 8.1 | T3 | ||
| 14 | BUF | 8.0 | T3 | ||
| Tier 4 | |||||
| 15 | KC | 7.7 | T4 | ||
| 16 | CAR | 7.7 | T4 | ||
| RK | Player | Team | Proj | Tier | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | |||||
| 1 | Cincinnati Bengals |
CIN | 9.8 | T1 | 9.8 pt DEF projection indicates solid defensive production expected from the Bengals this season. |
| 2 | New England Patriots |
NE | 9.3 | T1 | 9.3 pt DEF projection indicates below-average defensive scoring expected from New England this season. |
| 3 | Pittsburgh Steelers |
PIT | 8.9 | T1 | |
| Tier 2 | |||||
| 4 | Jacksonville Jaguars |
JAX | 8.9 | T2 | |
| 5 | Los Angeles Rams |
LAR | 8.8 | T2 | |
| 6 | Washington Commanders |
WAS | 8.2 | T2 | |
| 7 | Kansas City Chiefs |
KC | 8.0 | T2 | |
| 8 | Seattle Seahawks |
SEA | 6.9 | T2 | |
| Tier 3 | |||||
| 9 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers |
TB | 6.6 | T3 | |
| 10 | Atlanta Falcons |
ATL | 6.6 | T3 | |
| 11 | Las Vegas Raiders |
LV | 6.5 | T3 | |
| 12 | Dallas Cowboys |
DAL | 6.5 | T3 | |
| 13 | New York Jets |
NYJ | 6.4 | T3 | |
| 14 | Green Bay Packers |
GB | 6.4 | T3 | |
| Tier 4 | |||||
| 15 | Buffalo Bills |
BUF | 6.4 | T4 | |
| 16 | Minnesota Vikings |
MIN | 6.4 | T4 | |